 |
« back to all literature
| Title |
Vertical profile of dioxin-like and estrogenic potencies in a
sediment core from Tokyo Bay, Japan. |
| Autor(s) |
Kannan K, Yamashita N, Villeneuve DL, Hashimoto S, Miyazaki A
and Giesy JP. |
| Journal |
Organohalogen Compounds |
| Year |
1996 |
| Volume |
33(1): |
| Pages |
149-160 |
| |
| Subject(s) |
DR-CALUX |
| Summary |
 |
This study demonstrates that the
novel in vitro CALUX (chemical-activated luciferase expression)
assay is a rapid, sensitive assay for assessing the toxic potency
of (mixtures of) aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-active compounds
in sediments and pore waters. A rat hepatoma (H4IIE) cell line,
stably transfected with a construct containing the dioxin-responsive
element (DRE) sequence and the luciferase reporter gene, was used
to determine the relative potency or the total activities of AhR-active
compounds in sediment and pore water extracts. This novel CALUX
assay had a detection limit of 0.5 fmol of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD). The sensitivity and linear working range was slightly
better than for the ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD) assay in
H4IIE wild type cells. The primary improvement of the CALUX assay
compared to the EROD assay, however, is that the CALUX assay is
insensitive to substrate inhibition. The CALUX activity induced
by organic extracts from 450-mg aliquots of sediment or 250-microl
aliquots of pore water corresponded with the instrumentally
analyzed degree of pollution of the sediment. Using pore water,
only a simple and rapid extraction procedure was needed, without
additional clean-up to prevent cell death. The response from pore
water samples in an 8-day early life stage test with zebra fish (Branchydanio
rerio) corresponded with the CALUX induction, although the
correlation was sometimes disturbed by heavy metals. Two
polychlorinated terphenyl mixtures, the PCB-substitute Ugilec 141,
polybrominated diphenylethers, and the PCB-mixture Clophen A50
were tested in the CALUX assay and had induction potencies that
were 10(-4)-10(-7) compared to TCDD.
[back up]
|
|